January 04 2018 | 0 Comments | 111 reads Average Rating: 3

The Risk Adjustment All-Stars: Five Key Players

by Tom Peterson in Risk Adjustment

Risk adjustment enables the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to pay health plans based on the anticipated cost of covering care for the beneficiaries they enroll. Therefore, it’s important for health plans (and provider groups with percent of premium contracts) to get risk adjustment right. Perplexingly, though, risk adjustment is often handled by just a single department – or, worse yet, sometimes tacked on to somebody’s “day job.”

Taking such an approach is limited as single departments often have a narrow vision of organizational activities; silos often develop making it difficult to comprehensively address risk adjustment; and senior leadership typically is not involved in these independent efforts.

Risk adjustment should be a team effort. The following five departments can be key players:

#1: Quality. Typically quality departments are only involved in risk adjustment after the fact – and, therefore, have a limited effect on member behavior. If the quality department is involved in risk adjustment earlier though it can have a greater impact. For example, the quality department might proactively establish a specific goal such as increasing breast cancer screening by 10%. Having an established goal at the beginning of the year is much more effective than simply looking at the performance numbers at the end of the year.

#2: Member or patient engagement. These professionals work directly with members and patients and, therefore, have the ability to influence behavior. For example, if you have a diabetes program, staff who are reaching out to members to ensure compliance can also focus in on encouraging members to see their physicians in an effort to close care gaps related to breast cancer screening, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) or other health issues. While these care gaps are closed, documentation gaps for risk adjustment can be simultaneously addressed by the physician.

#3: Finance. Having the finance department, which typically acts as the investment gatekeeper, involved early on in the risk adjustment process makes it possible to secure the support needed to invest in risk adjustment initiatives. The finance department can also provide insight into the potential impact of payment changes.

#4: Contract/provider relations. When it comes to reimbursement, providers often fear that they're being underpaid while payers guard against mistakenly overpaying the providers they work with. The provider relations department can create the transparency needed to assuage such concerns. In addition, the provider relations department can provide a “line of sight” into payment changes.

#5: Technology. In today’s world, everything is electronic and a single disruption can have a negative effect downstream. The technology department can ensure that electronic systems are running smoothly and that data is managed optimally. In addition, the technology department can ensure that data is handed off among departments in a manner that ensures the integrity of the data as it traverses across the continuum.

By bringing all of these departments into risk adjustment efforts, healthcare organizations can create a winning risk adjustment program. For a more in-depth discussion of why this team approach is necessary and other risk adjustment best practices, tune into our webinar entitled “The Risk Adjustment Rallying Cry.”

Rate this Article:

Rating: 
Average: 3 (2 votes)

Author
Tom Peterson
SVP, Risk Adjustment

Tom Peterson brings more than 25 years of experience in healthcare. Prior to joining the SCIO® team, Tom was CEO and co-founder of Clear Vision Information Systems (acquired by SCIO® in 2016), which designed software and services to optimize care and revenue for plans and providers across the country.

Read full profile and other posts |

Log in to post comments

SEARCH BLOG

OUR THOUGHT LEADERS

Arun Rangamani
SVP, Care Optimization and SCIOXpert Services


Ben Steverman
Chief Technology Officer


Bob Abrahamson
Vice President, Product Management


David Hom
Chief Evangelist


Dr. Kevin Keck
Chief Medical Officer


Jen Cressman
Vice President, Professional Services


John Pagliuca
Vice President, Life Sciences


Jonathan Niloff, MD (Guest Author)
President, Niloff Healthcare Strategies, LLC


Lalithya Yerramilli
Vice President, Analytics


Lesli Adams, MPA (Guest Author)
Director of Population Health Strategy, Oracle Corporation


Leslie Strader
Project Manager


Linda Pantovic (Guest Author)
Director of Compliance & Risk Adjustment, Scripps Health Plan Services


Mark Feeney
Life Sciences Consultant


Monique Pierce
Vice President, Business Optimization


Nayfe Faillace
Chief Compliance & Privacy Officer


Nicole Cormier
Senior Manager, Home Health


Priyanka Rajkumar
VP - SCIOXpert and Solutions, Analytics


Rachel Hall
Senior Business Analyst


Rena Bielinski
SVP, Strategic Accounts


Rodger Smith
SVP, Payment Integrity


Rose Higgins
President, North America


Subha Vaidyanathan
VP, Technology and Data Management


Taryn Bevilacqua
Compliance Director


Tom Peterson
SVP, Risk Adjustment


ARCHIVES

Sign up to receive the latest SCIO news & insights, industry updates, event updates and more, right in your inbox.